Jump to content

Talk:CT scan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCT scan has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 18, 2021Good article nomineeNot listed
April 9, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 27, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the first commercially viable CT scanner was invented by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1972?
Current status: Good article


Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk10:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Iflaq (talk). Self-nominated at 10:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Substantial article, meeting of GA criteria implicates DYK pass. Article was nominated within 7 days of passing GA. Nominator is QPQ exempt. Hooks are interesing, cited, and short enough for DYK. Earwigs shows close paraphrasing in the "Multiplanar reconstruction and projections" and "Volume rendering" sections that need to be resolved before this nomination is passed. Morgan695 (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou @Morgan695 for the review. I have already started working on it and will resolve the issue soon. Thankyou. Iflaq (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Morgan695, I want to let you know that the issue has been resolved. Iflaq (talk) 09:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Close paraphrasing has been resolved. Morgan695 (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 April 2025

[edit]

– We might consider moving this article to "computed tomography", as it is the full technical term, similar to magnetic resonance imaging. Most related articles (operation of computed tomography, electron beam computed tomography, computed tomography of the head/thyroid/chest/abdomen and pelvis, computed tomography angiography, industrial computed tomography, and many more) also use the full term.

Additionally, we should standardize terminology—either using, for instance, "angiograph" or "angiography". The general term for the technology is likely the better choice. While abbreviations should be mentioned in the lead sections, they don’t seem appropriate for article titles. This would also align with WP:MEDMOS and WP:AT. Although "CT scan" may sound more familiar and convenient, "computed tomography" appears to be more commonly used, according to Ngrams. –Tobias (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]