Talk:CT scan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CT scan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | CT scan has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 27, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the first commercially viable CT scanner was invented by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1972? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about CT scan.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 10:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- ... that the first commercially viable CT scanner was invented by Sir Godfrey Hounsfield in 1972? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that CT scans can have 100 to 1,000 times higher radiation dose than conventional X-rays? Source: [2]
Improved to Good Article status by Iflaq (talk). Self-nominated at 10:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC).
Substantial article, meeting of GA criteria implicates DYK pass. Article was nominated within 7 days of passing GA. Nominator is QPQ exempt. Hooks are interesing, cited, and short enough for DYK. Earwigs shows close paraphrasing in the "Multiplanar reconstruction and projections" and "Volume rendering" sections that need to be resolved before this nomination is passed. Morgan695 (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thankyou @Morgan695 for the review. I have already started working on it and will resolve the issue soon. Thankyou. Iflaq (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Morgan695, I want to let you know that the issue has been resolved. Iflaq (talk) 09:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Close paraphrasing has been resolved. Morgan695 (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Morgan695, I want to let you know that the issue has been resolved. Iflaq (talk) 09:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 2 April 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
- CT scan → Computed tomography
- Coronary CT angiography → Coronary computed tomography angiography
- CT pulmonary angiogram → Computed tomography pulmonary angiography
– We might consider moving this article to "computed tomography", as it is the full technical term, similar to magnetic resonance imaging. Most related articles (operation of computed tomography, electron beam computed tomography, computed tomography of the head/thyroid/chest/abdomen and pelvis, computed tomography angiography, industrial computed tomography, and many more) also use the full term.
Additionally, we should standardize terminology—either using, for instance, "angiograph" or "angiography". The general term for the technology is likely the better choice. While abbreviations should be mentioned in the lead sections, they don’t seem appropriate for article titles. This would also align with WP:MEDMOS and WP:AT. Although "CT scan" may sound more familiar and convenient, "computed tomography" appears to be more commonly used, according to Ngrams. –Tobias (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Technology
- GA-Class vital articles in Technology
- GA-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- GA-Class emergency medicine and EMS articles
- Mid-importance emergency medicine and EMS articles
- Emergency medicine and EMS task force articles
- GA-Class radiology articles
- Top-importance radiology articles
- Radiology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- GA-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- GA-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
- Requested moves